Law enforcement on cases of corruption is currently occurring "selective logging" so that it has not been able to realize justice for both the community and the perpetrators. the purpose to analyze the development of the role of the judge in the law enforcement process against corruption cases. The approach method in this research is normative juridical, using secondary data. The result of the study shows that the Judge who held the corruption case must have data in the form of evidence presented in court about the involvement of other parties mentioned by the witnesses and defendants in court, and knew the involvement and accountability that should be charged to parties untouched by the law. Based on this matter, the judges should be able to order that the allegedly involved parties be named as suspects either as perpetrators or as participants who together defendants commit criminal acts of corruption, but provisions that provide such authority are not regulated in the procedural law and the Corruption Court Act. Recommendations need to develop the role of judges given by making amendments to Article 6 of the Law. No.46/2009 concerning the Corruption Court, by increasing the authority of the judge to be able to decide the case for the determination of a suspect of a corruption crime, either based on the results of a case examination at court or based on an application from the public by submitting evidence that meets the standard of evidence to the court of action criminal corruption.

Keywords : The Role of Judges, Selective Logging, Criminal Acts, Corruption