Authors : Nohelia Elizabeth Díaz Correa, Nilson Figueroa Atencia, Mario Armando Echeverría Acuña, Aniu Margarita Figueroa, Rosa Emilia Meza Lastra, Elizabeth Ramirez Llerena
Volume/Issue : Volume 4 - 2019, Issue 12 - December
Google Scholar : https://goo.gl/DF9R4u
Scribd : https://bit.ly/3870ATW
The objective of this research work was to
address a study in which the figure of Amicus Curiae is
theoretically analyzed and quantitatively examined with
a statistical survey in groups focused on the city of
Cartagena, for to get the perception of lawyers on the
incidence of Amicus Curiae in the special jurisdiction
for peace in Colombia; The unit of analysis was to
establish whether the incidence of Amicus Curiae in the
special jurisdiction for peace in Colombia, is an
interference with Colombian domestic law or a
recognition of international human rights law, and as
variables we have: Examine the Amicus Curiae from
the perspective of the theory of human rights and
protection instruments; Perform a Normative,
Jurisprudential and Doctrinal analysis on the Special
Justice for Peace and Amicus Curiae in Colombia and
in Comparative Law. The investigation that was carried
out is socio legal. The method that was applied was the
case study. As primary sources, surveys were used. The
analysis was done through statistical survey and content
analysis. As findings we have that the participation of
these foreigners in the Special Justice of Peace that is
implemented in our country, is not exempt from a great
debate on the sovereignty of Colombia to solve the
conflict with the FARC that lasted more than fifty
years, for what the implications of the investigation
consist in that the committee of election of the friends of
the court received the citizen observations on the
foreign candidates who wanted to conform the Integral
System of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Non-
Repetition in Colombia.
Keywords : Armed Conflict, Peace Agreement, Special Justice, Amicus Curiae, Human Rights, International Humanitarian Law.