Authors : Dr. Farhan Imtiaz Chowdhury; Dr. Mir Rasekh Alam Ovi; Dr. Md. Musab Khalil; Dr. Shamima Nasrin
Volume/Issue : Volume 5 - 2020, Issue 9 - September
Google Scholar : http://bitly.ws/9nMw
Scribd : https://bit.ly/3jvCCI7
DOI : 10.38124/IJISRT20SEP466
Rupture of the Achilles tendon was reportedly first
described by Ambroise Pare in 1575 and was reported in
the literature in 1633. After the 1920s the use of operative
treatment increased, primarily because of reports by
Abrahamsen in 1923 and Quenu and Stoianovitch in 1929
who advocated surgical repair, based on accumulated cases
from the literature. In this series we used 5 parameters
according to Juhana Leppilahti Modified scoring system to
assess the final outcome of the patient functionally. These
were stand on affected tip toe unsupported, range of motion
of affected side ankle, power of planter flexion, calf muscle
wasting and complications. These parameters were also
used in various study described in various literature. So,
early repair of open Tendo Achilles injury provided an
effective outcome, which was comparable with the result
described in others.
The study was designed as a prospective cohort study
conducted at Rajshahi Medical College Hospital from
January 2017 to December 2017. Study was carried out on
50 patients hospital admitted with ruptured tendoachillis,
irrespective of age and sex. Modified Kessler was the
procedure as operative treatment for their disease.
Outpatient follow-up was undertaken.
In our study among 50 patients 38(76%) were male
and 12(24%) were female. Mean age was 30.02 years with
standard deviation of ± 7.7. Most of the cases were operated
within 6 hours of injury. After final toileting wound swab
was sent for culture sensitivity and found in 60% cases E.
Coli, 6% Pseudomonas, 4% Klebshiela and in 30% cases
no growth. Mean delay of repair was 6 hours 7 minutes,
with standard deviation ± 2.362 minutes. In our study
median level of cut was 3.0 cm proximal to the insertion of
Tendo Achilles and where interquartile range was 2.5 to 3.5
cm. Mean follow up period was 9 months with standard
deviation was 2.37. Ankle motion were normal in 35 cases
(70%) and changes of motion were up to 6-10 degree in
13(26%) patients in this series, which was very much
acceptable in comparison to above studies. Only 2(4%)
patients had more than 10 degree motion restricted.
Common complications were superficial skin infection 4
cases (37%), mild swelling 4 cases (36%), ugly scar 2 cases
(18%) and wound gap 1 cases (9%). In our study no major
complication occurred but minor complications like
superficial skin infection, delayed wound healing occurred
which were successfully managed with an oral antibiotic
regimen with no long term sequelae. In this series we
assessed fifty acute open Tendo Achilles injured patients
after 16 weeks of treatment. Among them 90%(45) can
stand on affected tip toes unsupported, around 4 cases (8%)
cannot stand on tip toes of affected foot can’t support but
able to stand on affected foot with unsupported. Around
2% (1 case) failed to stand on affected foot without support
due to severe infection and wound gap. The final result was
as followed excellent in 28 cases (56%), good in 16 cases
(32%), fair in 4 cases (8%), poor in 2 cases (4%). In this
study it was found that 85% satisfactory result among 50
patients of acute open tendo Achilles injured patients by
immediate repair. If this procedure put in total population
then satisfactory result was found in following confidence
interval (at 5% level of significance). According to Juhana
Leppilahti Modified Score at 95% Confidence Interval
satisfactory outcome is 78.99% to 97.00%, which was
comparable with the result described in others.
Early repair of open Tendo Achilles complete or
partial provided an effective outcome, which was
comparable with the result described in others.
Keywords : Tendoachilles , Outcome, Primary Repair